Oral Defense Rubric

TOTAL SCORE
CATEGORY SCORING CRITERIA POINTS
3
 The research is relevant to the SHS track/strand that the research team belongs to.
3
 The research topic is appropriate to the level of the researchers.
5
 The research topic or idea is innovative, or presents an innovative process to
Clarity, understanding a rather common area of research.
Coherence, and
 The chosen research topic as reflected by the stated research question (or objective) 5
Creativity (30
points) is focused.
5
 The paper, in its entirety, has been written to form a cohesive whole.
 The scope and delimitation of the study is clear and appropriate to the level of the 4
students.
 The introduction (or background of the study) clearly presents the gap in research 5
addressed by the study.
3
 The research title clearly encapsulates the idea proposed by the study.
3
 The paper contains enough information to support its idea.
4
 All literature cited in the paper provide support for the conduct of the study.
Reasoning and
Organization (30  All sources are reliable. 4
points)  The abstract presents a strong and organized summary of the research conducted. 4
4
 Conclusions and recommendations are supported by the data presented and is clearly
based on how the data was analyzed.
4
 Discussion of results have been organized to convince the study has significance.
 The submitted paper adheres with the required format in terms of font style, table 4
and figure formats, margination, etc.
Writing
 All in-text citations and references agree and are correctly formatted to follow APA 4
Mechanics (12
points) style, 6th Edition.
4
 Not more five spelling and grammatical errors have been spotted in the paper.
 The selected research design is appropriate for the study based on the stated research 5
question(s).
5
 Instruments used have underwent validation.
Research Design
and Methodology  Statistical tools used to analyze data are appropriate based on the research questions 5
(28 points) and the kind of data.
 The Methodology part of the paper highlights the important data gathered through 5
the study.
5
 All discussions agree with the presented data and appear to be unbiased.
100
TOTAL POINTS
RUBRICS IN EVALUATING THE RESEARCH PROJECT
______________________________ ____________________
Teacher’s Signature Date
RUBRICS IN EVALUATING THE ORAL DEFENSE

Category Scoring Criteria Total Score
Points
 Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework 4
for the rest of the presentation.
 The conclusion is satisfying and relates back to introduction. 3

Content
 Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made reflect well their relative 3
(55 points) importance.
 Information is presented in a logical sequence and appropriately cites requisite number 4

of references.
 Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. 4
 The Presentation contains accurate information and has no misspellings or grammatical 3

errors.
 Discussion was superior, accurate, and engaging. 5
 Conclusions/summaries and recommendations appropriate and clearly based on 6

outcomes. Demonstrates substance and depth; is comprehensive; shows mastery of the
material.
 Student has a clear grasp of information. Citations are introduced and attributed 8
appropriately and accurately. Supporting material is original, logical and relevant.
 Masterfully defends research by providing clear and insightful answers to all the 15

questions; Uses presentation resources as a guide and speaking outline or note cards are
used for reference only.
 Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated 5
(e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).
 Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience 5
members can hear presentation.
Presentation
 Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. Student displays relaxed, self-confident 5
(40 points) nature about self, with no mistakes
 Good language skills and pronunciation are used. Limited use of filler words (“umm,” 5
“like,” etc.).
 Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. 5
 Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5
 Information was well communicated. Appropriate use of technology during presentation 10

(where relevant). Presentation of thesis/project work is clear and well-organized.
Responds to questions in poised, articulate, and professional manner.
Total Points 100
______________________________ ____________________
Teacher’s Signature Date

APPROVAL SHEET
This research entitled ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF MOTHER TONGUE ON

STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH AT ANGADANAN, ISABELA prepared and submitted by
Coloma, Ethel Gillian C, Mercado, Jhiemer D, Pastor, Patricia Laine T. and Napat, Yra Mariz D. in partial
fulfillment of the requirements in Research II has been examined and is recommended for acceptance and
approval of ORAL EXAMINATION.
ALYANNA JOVIDO
Adviser
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
Approved by the Committee on Oral examination with a grade of ___.
SAMUEL D. MEMITA, MT-I

Chairman
RESTY M. BARADDI, MT-I ARIEL MACADANGDANG, MT-I

Member Member
ROMANO C. SALAZAR, MT-I ANA ROSE M. DELA CRUZ, MT-I

Member Member
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Research II.
Date ______________________
EVELYN P. JOSE
Principal II

Oral Defense Rubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oral Defense Rubric

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oral Defense Rubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TOTAL SCORE

CATEGORY SCORING CRITERIA POINTS

Teacher’s Signature Date

RUBRICS IN EVALUATING THE ORAL DEFENSE

 The conclusion is satisfying and relates back to introduction. 3

 Information is presented in a logical sequence and appropriately cites requisite number 4

 Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. 4

 The Presentation contains accurate information and has no misspellings or grammatical 3

 Discussion was superior, accurate, and engaging. 5

 Conclusions/summaries and recommendations appropriate and clearly based on 6

 Masterfully defends research by providing clear and insightful answers to all the 15

 Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5

 Information was well communicated. Appropriate use of technology during presentation 10

Total Points 100

Teacher’s Signature Date

This research entitled ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF MOTHER TONGUE ON

Approved by the Committee on Oral examination with a grade of ___.

SAMUEL D. MEMITA, MT-I

RESTY M. BARADDI, MT-I ARIEL MACADANGDANG, MT-I

ROMANO C. SALAZAR, MT-I ANA ROSE M. DELA CRUZ, MT-I

You might also like