SIX Dangerous Myths About Pay: by Jeffrey Pfeffer

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

SIX dangerous Myths about Pay • Amit Sahgal MBA19173

By Jeffrey Pfeffer • Analjeet Singh MBA19174


• Anshul Pandey MBA19176
• Pankaj Singh MBA19207
• Vivek Kedia MBA19244
That the labour rates and costs are the
same

2
The Fact

Higher labor rates lead to higher productivity which may very well exceed the
extra you are paying in labor.
As evident in the steel mill example
Cutting on labour costs through cutting
labour rates

4
The Fact

Cutting the labour rates will attract less experienced, slow and less
capable employees.
This will lead to loss in rate of production intermingled with lower
quality of production, therefore managers employing the cut on
labour rates might end up costing the firm more that they may save.
Labour costs are a significant part of total
cost

6
The Fact

This is a mixed bag, where some sectors do see their major capital
employed in hiring labour. Example- accounting and consulting firms
Generally for other sectors the ratio of labour cost to total cost
varies significantly, and it should be treated as such.
On the other hand the average manager will tend to focus much
more on labour costs than is required.
Lower labour rates are potentially a
competitive strategy

8
The Fact

Myth 3 evolves into myth 4 which leads them to believe that just the labour
cost could be counted as a potent strategy.
In reality this obsession with labour wages leads to more important things
being neglected, such as:
QUALITY SERVICE DELIVERY INNOVATION
any of which could be ground for competitive strategy
Individual incentive is most efficient of
ways to motivate a worker

10
The Fact

The basis to a more effective motivation is by offering intellectually


engaging work, family friendly environment, non monetary benefits,
better work environment by choosing fun, interesting and smart people
to work with the best-in-class equipment.
This would lead to lower employee turnover rate and will produce
highly motivated employees which could not be done by just the
monetary incentives.
Employees’ primary objective for working is
the money they earn

12
The Fact

This Myth while an extension of the previous focuses more on the


belief that the compensation which employees get in the form of
monetary is more valued by them than any other.
This has been systematically proven wrong by the software company
SAS which focused instead on the other forms of benefits they could
offer. They had the lowest turnover rate in the industry.
• The semantic difference in labour wage and

How do
labour cost (to company) is often neglected
• The further myths (first to fourth) stem from this
belief, that these two terms are one and the

managers
same
• Some managers find it easier to control labour
wages hence this will look good on paper as

keep falling
labour wages are in focus of others as well
• The labour wages are easily controllable than
other actual factors on production like

for these
manufacturing processes, changing the
company’s culture, or changing the product’s
design
• Agency theory: difference in perspectives of the

myths owners of the business and those who manage


it; leads to pursue of personal interest rather
than the organization's

14
• Only labour costs to the firm and not the labour
wages are of significance in total costs
• To avoid laying too much emphasis on individual
incentivization the fact in the words of Herbert
Simon might help: “people in organizations are
interdependent, the organization’s results are a

Avoid, but consequence of collective behavior and


performance. Therefore individual contributions are
not easily and reliably measured, nor necessary as
individuals can never enter the markets and

how?
compete”
• The more incentives you provide, more is the
money coming out of others’ pockets which goes
against the collective synergies needed by the
organization to succeed
• The fact that if a culture, where people work only
for the money offered, is propagated, they will
keep switching over to the max. offering by other
companies

15
Thanks!
Any
questions?

16

You might also like