SIX Dangerous Myths About Pay: by Jeffrey Pfeffer
SIX Dangerous Myths About Pay: by Jeffrey Pfeffer
SIX Dangerous Myths About Pay: by Jeffrey Pfeffer
2
The Fact
Higher labor rates lead to higher productivity which may very well exceed the
extra you are paying in labor.
As evident in the steel mill example
Cutting on labour costs through cutting
labour rates
4
The Fact
Cutting the labour rates will attract less experienced, slow and less
capable employees.
This will lead to loss in rate of production intermingled with lower
quality of production, therefore managers employing the cut on
labour rates might end up costing the firm more that they may save.
Labour costs are a significant part of total
cost
6
The Fact
This is a mixed bag, where some sectors do see their major capital
employed in hiring labour. Example- accounting and consulting firms
Generally for other sectors the ratio of labour cost to total cost
varies significantly, and it should be treated as such.
On the other hand the average manager will tend to focus much
more on labour costs than is required.
Lower labour rates are potentially a
competitive strategy
8
The Fact
Myth 3 evolves into myth 4 which leads them to believe that just the labour
cost could be counted as a potent strategy.
In reality this obsession with labour wages leads to more important things
being neglected, such as:
QUALITY SERVICE DELIVERY INNOVATION
any of which could be ground for competitive strategy
Individual incentive is most efficient of
ways to motivate a worker
10
The Fact
12
The Fact
How do
labour cost (to company) is often neglected
• The further myths (first to fourth) stem from this
belief, that these two terms are one and the
managers
same
• Some managers find it easier to control labour
wages hence this will look good on paper as
keep falling
labour wages are in focus of others as well
• The labour wages are easily controllable than
other actual factors on production like
for these
manufacturing processes, changing the
company’s culture, or changing the product’s
design
• Agency theory: difference in perspectives of the
14
• Only labour costs to the firm and not the labour
wages are of significance in total costs
• To avoid laying too much emphasis on individual
incentivization the fact in the words of Herbert
Simon might help: “people in organizations are
interdependent, the organization’s results are a
how?
compete”
• The more incentives you provide, more is the
money coming out of others’ pockets which goes
against the collective synergies needed by the
organization to succeed
• The fact that if a culture, where people work only
for the money offered, is propagated, they will
keep switching over to the max. offering by other
companies
15
Thanks!
Any
questions?
16