Arapaho vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,917,429 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.585% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 585.1 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $98,778, a difference of 30.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $90,722, a difference of 26.5%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $84,729, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $64,920, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $37,497, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 73.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.0%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 133.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 125.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 41.8%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).