Immigrants from Laos vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,452,176 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 81.2 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $64,920, a difference of 14.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $98,778, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $84,729, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $37,497, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($42,884 compared to $43,673, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $50,488, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.1%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.23%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.050%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%).