Iroquois vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,278,115 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.375% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 375.3 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $64,920, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,729, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,778, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,403, a difference of 0.77%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $50,488, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.0%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 38.3%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%).