Pima vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,316,352 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 35.3 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,173, a difference of 60.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,602, a difference of 52.1%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,971, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,542, a difference of 20.4%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 113.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 97.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 172.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 124.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 103.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 84.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 109.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 109.2%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 95.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 77.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%).