Brazilian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,134,463 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 132.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $30,644, a difference of 52.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $73,365, a difference of 42.3%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $63,262, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $35,326, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $82,821, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 127.0%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 113.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 51.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.4%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.3%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 78.9%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 75.9%), and associate's degree (48.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.3%).