Creek vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,523,378 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 80.8 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $99,904, a difference of 26.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $94,610, a difference of 26.4%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $102,676, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,173, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,827, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.8%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.1%).