Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,253,644 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,857, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,041, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $85,553, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $90,909, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $92,239, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $56,722, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.9%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.62%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 178.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 59.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.9%).