Iroquois vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,057,390 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 74.4 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,041, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,722, a difference of 5.6%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $78,327, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,190, a difference of 0.37%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $42,884, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%).