Chippewa vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,397,223 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,740, a difference of 20.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $95,512, a difference of 19.4%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $55,182, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,924, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,788, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 56.6%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%).