Creek vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,628,517 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 50.0 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $98,896, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $92,241, a difference of 23.2%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $83,193, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,447, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,283, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 35.3%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.9%).