Creek vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,795,687 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,682, a difference of 31.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $96,866, a difference of 29.4%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $106,144, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,802, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,127, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 69.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 66.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.5%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.6%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.0%).