Immigrants from Central America vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,426,033 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,217 compared to $63,262, a difference of 17.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $73,365, a difference of 17.2%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.94%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($39,762 compared to $38,285, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 59.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 121.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.2%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (68.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 70.8%), bachelor's degree (27.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and associate's degree (35.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (76.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (80.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%).