Taiwanese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,445,027 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 184.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $30,644, a difference of 51.6%), median household income ($89,900 compared to $63,262, a difference of 42.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $73,365, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $35,326, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 138.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 125.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 114.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 192.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 141.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.0%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.9%), bachelor's degree (40.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 72.2%), and associate's degree (47.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 70.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.2%).