Subsaharan African vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,810,823 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $30,644, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $73,365, a difference of 23.6%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $63,262, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 123.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and associate's degree (43.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.30%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and 7th grade (95.7% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%).