Bhutanese vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,500,727 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $67,626, a difference of 6.9%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $53,154, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $54,389, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($119,800 compared to $120,487, a difference of 0.57%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $110,398, a difference of 0.80%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $44,169, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.1%), poverty (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.92%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%).