Zimbabwean vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,769,719 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.143% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 142.7 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $53,154, a difference of 16.1%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $63,939, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $110,398, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $67,626, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,389, a difference of 6.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.3%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.7%).