Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,269,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to a decrease of 82.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,509 compared to $33,931, a difference of 31.2%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $33,236, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($102,823 compared to $83,639, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $50,422, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $52,801, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $84,910, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.77%), currently married (43.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.52, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%).