Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,668,801 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.597. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 71.2 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 34.2%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $33,236, a difference of 16.2%), and per capita income ($38,766 compared to $33,931, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $50,422, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $52,801, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $84,910, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.9%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.9%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.52, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 103.9%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 74.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 67.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 48.5%), master's degree (13.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%).