Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,467,284 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.577% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to a decrease of 577.5 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $33,931, a difference of 47.3%), median family income ($115,880 compared to $83,639, a difference of 38.6%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $44,960, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,422, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $52,801, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.3%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (47.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (64.0% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 67.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 131.9%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 116.0%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.8%), female disability (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 10.1%).