Iroquois vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,570,026 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $33,931, a difference of 15.2%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $44,960, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $33,236, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.80%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $73,160, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $52,801, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.6%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.39%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 93.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.88%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%).