Immigrants from Fiji vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,951,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $63,681, a difference of 47.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $71,337, a difference of 45.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $74,257, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.5%), median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $35,266, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $47,012, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 128.8%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 113.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 230.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 221.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 198.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.3%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.82, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 114.0%), bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.4%).