Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,765,381 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 22.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $91,171, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $82,560, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $56,975, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,694 compared to $43,997, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $52,860, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $45,682, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 78.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).