Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,199,332 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $82,254, a difference of 26.4%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $77,559, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $47,916, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $39,529, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $37,965, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 19.8%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.25, a difference of 6.2%), currently married (46.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 66.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).