Immigrants from Fiji vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,744,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 20.2%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $50,057, a difference of 17.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $63,827, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $57,003, a difference of 0.12%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $68,822, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $44,586, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (68.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%).