Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,480,929 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $106,164, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $107,715, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.65%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $40,977, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $48,673, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.87%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 34.4%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.3%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 64.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).