Ecuadorian vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,364,264 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 24.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,470, a difference of 17.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $111,306, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,898, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,923, a difference of 4.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $49,501, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.0%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.3%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.76%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 157.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 17.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%).