Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,454,797 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to an increase of 32.6 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 35.0%), median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $34,802, a difference of 24.6%), and per capita income ($46,929 compared to $37,842, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $52,888, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $50,852, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $91,956, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 40.4%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 69.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 59.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.8%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 142.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 110.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 21.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 86.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 74.2%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.68%), 10th grade (92.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 129.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.48%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.2%).