Northern European vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,266,211 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.863. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.233% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 232.7 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $44,757, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($48,887 compared to $53,043, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $111,430, a difference of 3.3%), median family income ($110,635 compared to $114,586, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $62,162, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.65%), currently married (48.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 111.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.2%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.6%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.1%).