Northern European vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,981,619 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 98.1 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,698 compared to $57,384, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($58,588 compared to $68,716, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,457 compared to $117,219, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $69,857, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $55,913, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.0%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.79%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 96.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 52.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).