Northern European vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Northern European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Northern Europeans

Iroquois

Excellent
Fair
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Northern European Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,960,769 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 75.7 Iroquois.
Northern European Integration in Iroquois Communities

Northern European vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $87,255, a difference of 23.6%), median family income ($110,635 compared to $90,543, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($47,698 compared to $39,104, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $47,380, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.2%), and wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.8%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,698
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,635
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,446
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,887
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,588
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,491
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,678
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$100,457
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,870
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,658
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.3%
Excellent
25.1%

Northern European vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 37.9%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.0%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.4%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
13.5%

Northern European vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Northern European vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
80.6%

Northern European vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Tragic
38.2%

Northern European vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.7%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.5%

Northern European vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.0%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.0%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.6%

Northern European vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.2%).
Northern European vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricNorthern EuropeanIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%