Northern European vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,759,430 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 28.0 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($47,698 compared to $45,043, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,457 compared to $95,698, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $40,739, a difference of 0.61%), householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($48,887 compared to $48,041, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.8%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.6%), college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%).