Osage vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,142,233 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 19.6 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,913, a difference of 17.6%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $86,920, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $97,544, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,510, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,247, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.5%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.9%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%).