Osage vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,804,486 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 210.7 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,472, a difference of 17.1%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $87,557, a difference of 16.4%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $106,541, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,177, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $55,290, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,923, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.78%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.1%), currently married (47.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.3%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 60.7%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%).