Osage vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,151,430 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.195% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 195.0 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $65,874, a difference of 18.3%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,627, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $83,575, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,108, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $36,459, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.13%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.38, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 95.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).