Slavic vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,583,990 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.676% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 676.4 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $54,159, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($105,144 compared to $121,840, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $111,676, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $54,571, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $69,003, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.3%).