Slavic vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slavic
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slavs
Iroquois
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Slavic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,535,015 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 41.3 Iroquois.
Slavic vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $87,255, a difference of 17.6%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $74,279, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $90,543, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,049 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Good $105,144 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,398 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,470 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,390 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,613 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,563 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,377 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,629 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,709 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Poverty Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Unemployment Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.94%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Good 6.5% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.1%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Slavic vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Slavic | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |