Slavic vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Iroquois

Good
Fair
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,535,015 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 41.3 Iroquois.
Slavic Integration in Iroquois Communities

Slavic vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $87,255, a difference of 17.6%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $74,279, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $90,543, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricSlavicIroquois
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Slavic vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%

Slavic vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Slavic vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Slavic vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.94%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicIroquois
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Tragic
38.2%

Slavic vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Slavic vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.1%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Slavic vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Slavic vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricSlavicIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%