Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,365,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 38.3 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $54,159, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $64,987, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $111,676, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,003, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,571, a difference of 6.5%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.1%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%).