Spaniard vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Spaniard
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Spaniards
Chickasaw
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Spaniard Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,594,715 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Spaniard communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.839. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spaniards within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spaniards corresponds to an increase of 298.1 Chickasaw.

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,889 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.5%), median household income ($84,644 compared to $70,005, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,366 compared to $77,929, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($38,656 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($46,059 compared to $40,672, a difference of 13.2%).

Income Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,028 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,617 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,644 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,059 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,401 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,656 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,117 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,366 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,889 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,866 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

Poverty Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Poor 13.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 11.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

Unemployment Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

Labor Participation Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

Family Structure Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

Vehicle Availability Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

Education Level Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 59.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

Disability Metric | Spaniard | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |