Sudanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,289,298 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,695 compared to $36,475, a difference of 14.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $82,193, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($96,783 compared to $85,356, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.0%), median male earnings ($51,216 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $77,929, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.59%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.40%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.2%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.1%).