Fijian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,523,164 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.870% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 869.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $71,021, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $105,149, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $89,919, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,461, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $55,158, a difference of 10.0%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.34%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 56.7%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%).