Turkish vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,790,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $87,255, a difference of 35.0%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $39,104, a difference of 34.0%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $90,543, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $36,408, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.22%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 67.9%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.9%).