Pima vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,092,202 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 31.7 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,233, a difference of 41.1%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $100,322, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,597, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,856, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $93,039, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 163.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 127.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 161.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 130.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 97.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 58.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.070%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.65%).