Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,747,403 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 64.7%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.19% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 3.5% | 15.2% |
Range | 3.3% | 14.8% |
Mean | 1.7% | 5.4% |
Median | 1.8% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.65% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.65% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |