Lebanese vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
54.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,298,237 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 47.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 17.0% | 15.2% |
| Range | 16.4% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Scandinavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |