Kiowa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Kiowa
Chickasaw
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,085,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 2.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 15.2% |
Range | 13.4% | 14.8% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |