Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Chickasaw
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 35.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 9.3% | 15.2% |
| Range | 9.0% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |