Danish vs African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
African
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Danes
Africans
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,459,007 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,760,233 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521 and weighted average of 21.9%, a difference of 60.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | African |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.2% | 98.3% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 33.9% |
| Median | 14.1% | 31.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 18.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 18.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.66%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |