Danish vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
French
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Danes
French
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,459,007 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,650,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 16.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | French |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.2% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 27.8% |
| Median | 14.1% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 29.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Danes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to French by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |